« Kirkuk: a place that should be seen--and heard | Main | A Night Patrol in Baghdad »

June 24, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c64169e20115705b6320970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference To embed or not to embed?:

Comments

Old SOLDIERR

waaaattttttt???????????????????

Unknown

Excellent write, Buck.

Bob

embedding? last time i checked, freedom of speech-in america-is a right granted by america to americans within america. reporters have no "rights" to a battlefield in a foreign country and no business on a battlefield. how exactly can a story about a couple of idiot soldiers killing their selves with a bad batch of moonshine in a combat zone be construed as news? it's trash, and it's indicative of the "quality" of reporters that slink around these days, badmouthing anyone they can for a quick buck. no one outside of your profession respects you. no soldier with any respect for himself or his country would give you the time of day. to include your "name-drop" friends. these people only talk to you because they were ordered to accomodate you and they don't want you to slander them publicly. giving reporters access to combat zones and military operations was the worst idea our misled congress ever contrived. coming in at a close second is the media-fed myth that an "educated populace" can make informed decisions about a war from the comfort of their living rooms. the scope of your personal responsibility ends with your pocketbook. the scope of a soldier's personal responsibility is unquantifiable. get a real job. we don't want you in Afghanistan.

The comments to this entry are closed.

ABOUT THIS BLOG

Baghdad Observer is written by McClatchy journalists staffing the Baghdad bureau.

Feel free to send a story suggestion. Read their stories at news.mcclatchy.com.

THIS MONTH

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
              1 2
    3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    10 11 12 13 14 15 16
    17 18 19 20 21 22 23
    24 25 26 27 28 29 30
    31