« Taking a big jump | Main | Tempest in a coffee cup »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c64169e200e54f07350e8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The race (back) to the moon:

Comments

What if the Chinese get to the moon and discover that there are moon cakes there left behind from visitors that came before them?

Picture them breaking open the moon cake, and inside is a slip of paper.... saying.... revolt on October 10!

A posting about going for the moon attracts hardly any comments. Not even talk Moon Cakes can bring out the fruit cakes on this blog...

Perhaps they have taken their quarrel to the dark side of the moon?

The US went to the moon first, even if it was 30 years ago and we didn't stay. Also, when the US returns, it will be with the building blocks for a long term presence, not to take videos and rock samples.

When the US returns to the moon with building blocks etc. for a long term presence, will the effort have to be financed with bonds purchased by China?

Perhaps, China will need to buy those bonds to maintain its fixed currency exchange rate.

Why go back to the moon in anycase?? NASA has had its sights on Mars for decades now.

Going to Mars is just sort of heading home... it is Venus that must be avoided.

Who needs to make it all the way to the Astronauts corps only to be henpecked?

I totally agree with your opinion that Chinese astronauts would land on the moon before U.S astronauts.
It might be a good thing for different countries planning to land on the moon at the same time,competition results in pressure and pressure ensure the programme become more efficent.I only wish that the some tragedy of STS Challenger won't happen again.

I wonder why moon is so attracitve that the world is crazy about it. We sent satellites to take pictures and landed a man on it, with the cost of billions of dollars. But, what's the benifit? Many countries state that it is for further exploration of buiding habitation on moon, but who would live there at a cost of maybe 1 million per day? Bill Gateses? Even he would not choose to live there, because it is meaningless. Why not using all that money to make our environment better instead of planning another earth?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

ABOUT THIS BLOG

Tim

"China Rises" is written by Tim Johnson, the Beijing bureau chief for McClatchy Newspapers. He covers both China and Taiwan.

Send a story suggestion.

Read Tim's stories at news.mcclatchy.com.

THIS MONTH

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30    

Photo Albums