International Crisis Group calls on Musharraf to go

The well-respected International Crisis Group, in a report on Pakistan issued Wednesday, calls on Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf to leave office.

This is a somewhat unusual stance for a public policy group like the ICG to take in such a high-profile crisies. Here's the key language:

Stability in Pakistan and its contribution to wider anti-terror efforts now require rapid transition to legitimate civilian government. This must involve the departure of Musharraf, whose continued efforts to retain power at all costs are incompatible with national reconciliation.

And here are the first few paragraphs of the executive summary of the report, entitled After Bhutto's Murder: A Way Forward for Pakistan:

OVERVIEW

Gravely damaged by eight years of military rule, Pakistan’s fragile political system received a major blow on 27 December 2007, when former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto was assassinated. Her murder, days before the parliamentary elections scheduled for 8 January 2008 and now postponed to 18 February, put an end to a U.S. effort to broker a power-sharing deal with President Pervez Musharraf which the centre-left Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) leader had already recognised was unrealistic. Her popularity and the belief Musharraf and his allies were responsible, directly or indirectly, have led to violent countrywide protests.

Stability in Pakistan and its contribution to wider anti-terror efforts now require rapid transition to legitimate civilian government. This must involve the departure of Musharraf, whose continued efforts to retain power at all costs are incompatible with national reconciliation; an interim consensus caretaker government and a neutral Election Commission; and brief postponement of the elections to allow conditions to be created – including the restoration of judicial independence – in which they can be conducted freely and fairly.

Bhutto’s death has drawn the battle lines even more clearly between Musharraf’s military-backed regime and Pakistan’s moderate majority, which is now unlikely to settle for anything less than genuine parliamentary democracy. Many in Pakistan fear that the federation’s very survival could depend on the outcome of this struggle.

Comments

[bert]

"National reconciliation"?
I can't see when such a thing happened in Pakistan, except against India.
Pakistan still is the country of the three "A", Allah, Army and America. I'd personnally add a fourth, Afghanistan, at least since 1975.
Stability in Pakistan means more money from the US, UE, and Arab countries, more tensions with India and more freedom for pakistanese taleban (main religious parties), as long as they use their heavy weapons in Afghanistan.